Search

Diana Fishbein, PhD

Home Institution: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute

Fields: Behavioral neuroscience, developmental psychology, prevention science, and criminology

Current Positions:

My Driving Question

Can proclaiming the next ten years as the “Decade of the Child” be an impetus for a shift to improved health and well-being for our children, founded on an accumulation of knowledge, evidence, and best practices, and supported by congress and the executive branch?

Scholar Project 

Similar to the roll-out of the “Decade of the Brain” (1990-1999), this four-pronged Nova Scholar project involves:

  1. An approach to the incoming administration to officially proclaim the next ten years to be the “Decade of the Child”;
  2. With the National Institutes of Health (NIH), prioritization of a corresponding program of research;
  3. Support from congressional appropriations; and
  4. Propulsion by public opinion in response to a public education campaign.

By marshalling support from the administration, congress, and the public, this project is intended to signal a shift toward a much-needed national strategy that prioritizes the health and well-being of our children, founded on an accumulation of evidence, knowledge, and best practices generated largely by NIH. We are working collectively at all levels to create the political and public will to elevate whole child health and wellbeing in our discourse, practices, systems, and policies. 

The NIH funds a wide range of health issues, with investments in biomedical research across nearly all the 27 institutes. Although called the National Institutes of Health, the focus has predominantly been on disease—its causes, manifestations, and treatments. What is less prominent in its research agenda is a specialized focus on conditions that impact children and youth, and even less so on the holistic nature of health issues and well-being; an explicit statement to this effect is in the strategic plans of only a handful of institutes despite the critical role of early experience for the prevention and treatment of every health condition. Moreover, health promotion and the prevention of problems have not yet been the primary emphasis.

A substantial body of knowledge has been accumulated regarding the detrimental effects of adverse social conditions (e.g., poverty, trauma, maltreatment, racism, community violence) on brain and body development in infants, children, adolescents, and young adults that increase risk for mental and behavioral health problems and their cascading impacts on chronic disease. Hundreds of randomized controlled trials showing the benefits of family, school, and community environments, interventions, and public policies on whole child health and well-being suggest prevailing risk conditions are amenable to intentional change and that malleable developmental processes can be improved with greater investments in whole child health promotion and the well-being of all children. The population-level benefits to be derived from a large-scale initiative that builds on these recent advances can be achieved by furthering whole child research, clinical application, prevention practices, and public health policies.

To exert a meaningful impact on the conditions that holistically influence child health and well-being, investments are needed in the development, evaluation, implementation, and scaling of evidence-based interventions and public health policies. Objectives of NIH research that this project advocates for includes determination of:

  • The impacts on these outcomes when services are appropriately delivered, adapted and scaled;
  • Whether population level disparities are narrowed; and
  • The extent to which child health and wellbeing measurably improve.

It is imperative that this line of research experimentally evaluates policy strategies for altering the root causes—the adverse social determinants of health and well-being—including poverty, discrimination, and opportunity inequality. Results of this research will provide a blueprint for development of a comprehensive national plan that supports children’s needs through legislation, agency level practices, and proximal environmental change (e.g., households, schools, clinics, communities). For children to flourish, key principles and elements identified in research to be essential to their health and well-being need to be in place, regardless of the setting.

Biography 

Dr. Diana (“Denni”) Fishbein is a senior scientist in the FPG Child Development Institute at University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. She is founder and co-director of the National Prevention Science Coalition to Improve Lives, a large professional organization dedicated to the transfer of knowledge from science to public health policies, and retains a part-time research faculty position at The Pennsylvania State University. 

Her 40-year-long career includes deep expertise in the fields of prevention science, neuroscience, and behavioral science, supported by numerous federal and national funding agencies and foundations to determine impacts of deleterious social contextual factors (e.g., trauma, family dysfunction, poverty) on brain development and behavioral/mental health in children and adolescents. Her research supports the premise that underlying neurobiological mechanisms interact with the quality of our psychosocial experiences and environmental contexts to alter trajectories either towards or away from risk behaviors. Her work further suggests that compensatory mechanisms can be strengthened with the appropriate psychosocial and environmental manipulations. 

As an extension of her basic research, Dr. Fishbein’s objective is to identify effective means of disrupting pathways to psychopathology in youth considered to be at-risk due to prevailing adverse conditions. A wide range of approaches are applied toward equipping local, state, and federal organizations and agencies with the tools to implement, sustain, and scale evidence-based, trauma-informed practices and policies to prevent poor outcomes and promote health and well-being in children and families. As such, Dr. Fishbein has been intensively engaged in advising congressional members, state legislators, state and federal agencies, national organizations and other entities regarding well-tested strategies shown to avert trajectories away from psychopathology.

Education and Training
  • NIH Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Applied Neuroscience Labs
  • PhD, Joint Degree in Criminology and Psychobiology with concentration in Neuroscience, Florida State University
  • MS, Criminology with specialization in Psychobiology, Florida State University
  • BS, Criminology, Florida State University
Selected Honors
  • Awards from the Society for Prevention Research: “Outstanding Contributions to the Advancement of the Field of Prevention Science,” “Special Contributions to Public Policy,” “Translational Science,” and “Public Service”
  • Inducted into the Hall of Fame, Florida State University, College of Criminology, 2019
  • Fellow, Society for Prevention Research, 2017
  • Special Contributions to Public Policy award, Society of Community Research Action (SCRA), 2019
  • Senior Fellowship, RTI International, 2009-2014
  • Strategic Development Award for Genomics Initiative, RTI International
  • High Published Authors Award, RTI International (each year from 2002-2013)
  • Staff Fellowship, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Addiction Research Center, Baltimore MD 1985-1989
  • NIH Fellowship, 1985-1989
Selected Publications

Healing is facilitated through safety, persistence, and trust.

  • Persistence: “People did not simply progress through this sequence and experience healing. The healing journey was a recursive, back and forth process. They found helpers, used the skills/resources that those helpers provided, found other helpers that provided more resources and used those skills and resources. As this process continued, people experienced a gradual amelioration of their suffering. Although many despaired at times, all demonstrated the quality of persistence—they refused to give up.”
  • Safety & Trust: “To connect to helpers, it was essential for people to feel safe in those relationships and able to trust that the person would be a helper and not a barrier to healing. Persons whose wounds included a violation of trust were especially careful about testing the safety of new relationships.”

Resources support us as we heal. They include reframing, responsibility, and positivity. “Making connections enabled participants to acquire and refine resources and skills that were essential in their healing journey. People also brought their own personal strengths to the journey.”

  • Reframing: “A particularly important skill was the ability to reframe—that is to look at suffering through a different lens.” This does NOT mean minimizing trauma or pain, but rather it often means the opposite: understanding what happened was wrong, unfair, or uncontrollable and that we are not to blame for it.
  • Responsibility: While we don’t have control over what happened to us, we are the only ones who can help ourselves heal. “A third essential resource that people acquired or refined was the ability to take an appropriate amount of responsibility for their healing journeys. They participated actively in the process of healing. Once again, some participants already had developed this skill, and some acquired or refined it from their helpers.”
  • Positivity: “Another resource that people acquired or refined during their healing journey was choose to be positive—that is to have some optimism about their situation.” People have varying predispositions to positivity. In the study, positivity was important in helping people heal. This doesn’t mean a toxic positivity, but rather simply finding some good in life and feeling hopeful about our situations.

“Connection to others was an essential part of all the healing journeys.” Humans are social creatures, and even the most introverted of us need close relationships. Friends and family add meaning and value to life and help support us, in good times and bad. 

When we experience relational trauma, relationships can feel scary, but reestablishing safety and trust in relationships is where the healing happens. (To be clear, we do not mean reestablishing safety and trust with abusers, but rather finding other healing relationships.) 

“When safety and trust had been established, people were able to connect with helpers. The nature of the behaviours of helpers that fostered healing ranged from small acts of kindness to unconditional love.”

  • “Moving from being wounded, through suffering to healing, is possible. It is facilitated by developing safe, trusting relationships and by positive reframing that moves through the weight of responsibility to the ability to respond.”
  • “Relationships with health professionals were among these but were not necessarily any more important to the healing journey than other kinds of helpers, which included family members, friends, spirituality and their God, pets, support groups, administrators, case workers and supervisors.”

Healing probably means different things to different people, but one definition that emerged from the study is: “The re-establishment of a sense of integrity and wholeness.” 

Healing was an emergent property that resulted from each individuals’ complex healing journey, a result of bridged connections between resources and relationships. “…they gradually found relief from suffering and began to exhibit emergent characteristics: a sense of hope, self-acceptance, and a desire to help others—the immediate precursors to healing.”

 In varying degrees, “they were able to transcend their suffering and in some sense to flourish.” 

  • Helping Others: We find meaning in helping others. “Understanding that suffering gives the strength and experience to help others in similar situations.”
  • Hope: We begin to have hope that we will not always feel this bad. A Crohn’s patient said, “I think gradually I realized that I was going to feel better. I did have days when I actually didn’t vomit, when I did feel better. And I think gradually I came to believe that maybe I could have a normal life again.”
  • Self-Acceptance: We see our inherent value and understand that we are not to blame for our suffering. A participant living with HIV said, “I’m really proud of myself. I think that now I still want to live. I don’t want to die, and I really love myself a lot. I have a lot of comfort in myself.”

Suffering is the ongoing pain from wounding. 

There is some debate about whether people always experience suffering on the path to healing.

Wounding happens when we experience physical or emotional harm. It can stem from chronic illness or by physical or psychological trauma for which we do not have the tools to cope, or a combination of those factors. 

“The degree and quality of suffering experienced by each individual is framed by contextual factors that include personal characteristics, timing of their initial or ongoing wounding in the developmental life cycle and prior and current relationships.”

Characteristics: How predisposed someone may be to wounding/how many tools and resources someone may have to deal with trauma/illness.

Lifestages: Developmental timing plays an important role in the impact of trauma — young children often do not have the same resources as older adults.

Relationships: Relationships can provide solace and support for those suffering, while lack of healthy relationships can prolong suffering.