Search
Event

Nova Campfire: What the World Needs Now: Love, Kindness, and Listening in an Era of Polarization

Thanks to our terrific speakers and panelists who joined us for the free, virtual Nova Campfire, “What the World Needs Now: Love, Kindness, and Listening in an Era of Polarization,” on June 4. 

In a time of growing polarization, disconnection, and uncertainty, this Campfire explored how we can build social trust and reduce partisan animosity. Through insights from social psychology, communications, spiritual practice, and community wisdom, we examined practical strategies for shifting cultural norms, strengthening shared identities, and advancing collective change. Love and kindness are central to these efforts as powerful tools for healing and transformation. 

Thought leaders and community practitioners working at the intersection of compassion, well-being, and social change shared their learnings and experiences with loving-kindness (metta) meditation, experiential dialogue, nature connection, and more. We examined how these practices bridge divides and cultivate empathy, connection, and care—and how research and validated tools can help measure and scale effective approaches to deepen compassionate love. And we highlighted how integrating spiritual and deeper perspectives supports more authentic, meaningful, and open-minded engagement.

These heart-centered practices foster emotional resilience and social trust—and they’re vital to our physical and societal well-being. They help reduce stress, nurture belonging, and deepen connections. At a time when the fabric of society feels increasingly frayed, leading with compassion and grounded care lights the way toward a more just, peaceful, and flourishing world. 

 

See the full event recording below and scroll further for individual presentations.

Program and Panelists

A brief introduction from Susan Prescott, director of the Nova Network, and Brian Berman, president and founder of the Nova Institute for Health, followed a general welcome and “mindful moment” from Rick Scott. Panelists spoke for around 6-7 minutes, weaving their narrative threads to provide the fabric for discussion that all attendees then contributed to.

Welcome

portrait of nova institute founder brian berman

Professor Brian Berman, MD, is the president and founder of the Nova Institute for Health and professor emeritus at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, where he was director of the Center for Integrative Medicine. He is one of the most highly funded National Institutes of Health (NIH) researchers in the field of integrative and complementary medicine. A pioneer in the field and founder of the first U.S. academic medical center-based program for integrative medicine in 1991, he received two Bravewell Collaborative awards in leadership and service. He continues to conduct NIH-funded research at University of Maryland and promote a broad vision of health through leadership at Nova Institute for Health.

What the World Needs Now

headshot of professor susan prescott

Susan Prescott is director of the Nova Network. She is a professor of planetary health at University of Western Australia, editor-in-chief of Challenges, and a Scholar at the Nova Institute for Health in Baltimore. She is a pediatrician, immunologist, artist, and award-winning author, internationally recognized for cutting-edge research into early environmental determinants of health and disease. Her global work promotes awareness of the interconnections between personal and planetary health in ways that inspire creative, integrated, and wise approaches, grounded in reciprocity, for social and ecological justice and flourishing futures.

More in Common Than We Think: Interventions to Reduce Partisan Animosity

Kurt Gray

Kurt Gray is a social psychologist and an award-winning researcher and teacher using interdisciplinary methods to study our deepest-held beliefs and how to bridge moral divides.Dr. Gray is the incoming Weary Family Foundation Endowed Chair in the Social Psychology of Polarization and Misinformation at Ohio State University. He is also a professor in psychology and neuroscience at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill where  he directs the Deepest Beliefs Lab, exploring the psychology of morality, politics, religion and AI. He also directs the Center for the Science of Moral Understanding, which explores new ways to reduce polarization. He is the author of Outraged: Why We Fight about Morality and Politics and How to Find Common Ground. 

Mitigating the Harms of Polarization: Harnessing Shared Identities to Build Social Trust

Dave Nelson

David Nelson is a Nova Institute Invited Faculty and part of the emerging field of generalism which encourages a broad knowledge base, an ability to synthesize information from various domains, and a desire to provide unique perspectives to emerging solutions. Specifically a non-specialist, he uses relativism and perspective as tools to make new and novel connections. He has published on topics ranging from clinical ecology and integrative medical modalities to nutritional considerations in health and disease.

Cultivating Common Ground: How Meditation Practices Might Reduce Polarization and Increase Pro‐Sociality and Pro‐Environmentalism

Lena Ramstetter

Lena Ramstetter explores the intersections of political psychology and contemplative practice to support social transformation. Her PhD research at the University of Salzburg examined how mindfulness influences affective polarization, environmental attitudes, and openness to opposing views—especially regarding climate change. She teaches at the University’s Department of Political Science and contributes to fostering a mindful, compassionate academic culture. Her work, published in Mindfulness, iScience, and Frontiers in Political Science, focuses on the emotional foundations of democratic engagement. Beyond academia, she facilitates courses that cultivate reflection, resilience, and connection across diverse settings.

How Meditation Practices Might Promote Empathic Concern and Person-Centered Supportive Communication

Susanne Jones

Susanne Jones is a professor in the Department of Communication Studies at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. Her research explores interpersonal communication, social support, and emotion regulation, with a focus on the verbal and nonverbal behaviors that help individuals cope with distress. Using experimental methods, she analyzes recorded conversations through quantitative coding procedures. Originally from Hamburg, Germany, she also grew up in Swakopmund and Windhoek, Namibia, and completed her degrees at Georgia Southern University, Indiana University, and Arizona State University.

Nature-Based Community Mindfulness Practices Promote Compassion and Connectedness

Knellee Bisram

Knellee Bisram transitioned from her career in international relations and consulting to dedicate her efforts to the Academy of the Heart and Mind Education and partnerships that build mindful, resilient communities. Serving as lead NGO representative to the United Nations, she leverages regional, national, and global multi-stakeholder partners to bring a nature-based, mindful approach to 21st century global challenges including water and climate justice, women’s well-being, and more. A longtime student of meditation, mindfulness, and various mind-body modalities, Knellee is the cocreator of the Be Nature program. She has designed curricula and taught mindfulness, mind-body, and emotional intelligence to broad audiences  in English and Spanish throughout the Americas. 

Date

June 4, 2025

Time

11:00 am – 12:30 pm ET

Healing is facilitated through safety, persistence, and trust.

  • Persistence: “People did not simply progress through this sequence and experience healing. The healing journey was a recursive, back and forth process. They found helpers, used the skills/resources that those helpers provided, found other helpers that provided more resources and used those skills and resources. As this process continued, people experienced a gradual amelioration of their suffering. Although many despaired at times, all demonstrated the quality of persistence—they refused to give up.”
  • Safety & Trust: “To connect to helpers, it was essential for people to feel safe in those relationships and able to trust that the person would be a helper and not a barrier to healing. Persons whose wounds included a violation of trust were especially careful about testing the safety of new relationships.”

Resources support us as we heal. They include reframing, responsibility, and positivity. “Making connections enabled participants to acquire and refine resources and skills that were essential in their healing journey. People also brought their own personal strengths to the journey.”

  • Reframing: “A particularly important skill was the ability to reframe—that is to look at suffering through a different lens.” This does NOT mean minimizing trauma or pain, but rather it often means the opposite: understanding what happened was wrong, unfair, or uncontrollable and that we are not to blame for it.
  • Responsibility: While we don’t have control over what happened to us, we are the only ones who can help ourselves heal. “A third essential resource that people acquired or refined was the ability to take an appropriate amount of responsibility for their healing journeys. They participated actively in the process of healing. Once again, some participants already had developed this skill, and some acquired or refined it from their helpers.”
  • Positivity: “Another resource that people acquired or refined during their healing journey was choose to be positive—that is to have some optimism about their situation.” People have varying predispositions to positivity. In the study, positivity was important in helping people heal. This doesn’t mean a toxic positivity, but rather simply finding some good in life and feeling hopeful about our situations.

“Connection to others was an essential part of all the healing journeys.” Humans are social creatures, and even the most introverted of us need close relationships. Friends and family add meaning and value to life and help support us, in good times and bad. 

When we experience relational trauma, relationships can feel scary, but reestablishing safety and trust in relationships is where the healing happens. (To be clear, we do not mean reestablishing safety and trust with abusers, but rather finding other healing relationships.) 

“When safety and trust had been established, people were able to connect with helpers. The nature of the behaviours of helpers that fostered healing ranged from small acts of kindness to unconditional love.”

  • “Moving from being wounded, through suffering to healing, is possible. It is facilitated by developing safe, trusting relationships and by positive reframing that moves through the weight of responsibility to the ability to respond.”
  • “Relationships with health professionals were among these but were not necessarily any more important to the healing journey than other kinds of helpers, which included family members, friends, spirituality and their God, pets, support groups, administrators, case workers and supervisors.”

Healing probably means different things to different people, but one definition that emerged from the study is: “The re-establishment of a sense of integrity and wholeness.” 

Healing was an emergent property that resulted from each individuals’ complex healing journey, a result of bridged connections between resources and relationships. “…they gradually found relief from suffering and began to exhibit emergent characteristics: a sense of hope, self-acceptance, and a desire to help others—the immediate precursors to healing.”

 In varying degrees, “they were able to transcend their suffering and in some sense to flourish.” 

  • Helping Others: We find meaning in helping others. “Understanding that suffering gives the strength and experience to help others in similar situations.”
  • Hope: We begin to have hope that we will not always feel this bad. A Crohn’s patient said, “I think gradually I realized that I was going to feel better. I did have days when I actually didn’t vomit, when I did feel better. And I think gradually I came to believe that maybe I could have a normal life again.”
  • Self-Acceptance: We see our inherent value and understand that we are not to blame for our suffering. A participant living with HIV said, “I’m really proud of myself. I think that now I still want to live. I don’t want to die, and I really love myself a lot. I have a lot of comfort in myself.”

Suffering is the ongoing pain from wounding. 

There is some debate about whether people always experience suffering on the path to healing.

Wounding happens when we experience physical or emotional harm. It can stem from chronic illness or by physical or psychological trauma for which we do not have the tools to cope, or a combination of those factors. 

“The degree and quality of suffering experienced by each individual is framed by contextual factors that include personal characteristics, timing of their initial or ongoing wounding in the developmental life cycle and prior and current relationships.”

Characteristics: How predisposed someone may be to wounding/how many tools and resources someone may have to deal with trauma/illness.

Lifestages: Developmental timing plays an important role in the impact of trauma — young children often do not have the same resources as older adults.

Relationships: Relationships can provide solace and support for those suffering, while lack of healthy relationships can prolong suffering.