In Laws, Nova Fellow Alan C. Logan, Scholar Susan Prescott, and coauthors Colleen Berryessa and Pragya Mishra discuss the relevance of the “judicial breakfast” in a judge’s well-being and event courtroom outcomes.
Emerging research in nutritional neuropsychology suggests that factors like diet, stress, and blood glucose levels may influence judicial decision-making, lending new insight into the long-discussed “hungry judge effect.” Originating from a 2011 study linking parole rulings to judges’ meal breaks, this theory reflects broader concerns about unconscious bias in the courtroom. As the field evolves, evidence increasingly points to the impact of stress and fatigue on judges’ mental states, highlighting the potential for diet and lifestyle interventions to improve both judicial well-being and the fairness of legal outcomes.
This work builds upon the March 2025 Nova Campfire, “Beyond Blame and Retribution: Rethinking Justice through Science and Social Evolution,” which was chaired by Susan Prescott and featured Colleen Berryessa and Pragya Mishra as panelists.





