In the British Journal of Nutrition, Nova Fellow Alan C. Logan and colleague Dr. Stephen Schoenthaler respond to a systematic review of dietary interventions and inmate behavior. While the authors commend the deep analysis into a timely topic, they express concern over the exclusion of studies where subjects acted as their own controls. They argue that including these quasi-experimental studies, many conducted in the 1980s, could have enriched the data pool, as they showed significant reductions in violence and antisocial behavior in correctional facilities.
While recognizing the importance of controlled trials, they highlight the challenges in implementing such studies in carceral settings and suggest that non-comparator-controlled research still offers valuable insights, especially regarding systemic dietary changes and their effects on behavior.





